My father was a
poet. He wrote amazing, long, rhymed
poetry for all occasions – birthdays, weddings, holidays – and gave them away
as presents.
He read Shakespearian
iambic pentameter and Neruda’s long, laborious odes (in the original Spanish) to
me before I knew who these poets were.
During the day my dad was
an accountant, but his real love included music and poetry. I did not inherit his musical ability (you do
not want to hear me sing or play the kazoo), but I did inherit his admiration
of poetry.
My own poetry is
forgettable so I prefer to relish in the poetry that isn’t.
My Catholic elementary
school had a tiny library. It fit in
what used to be the janitor’s closet, but right there tucked among the hundreds
of books on the saints and martyrs was Elizabeth Barrett Browning. She was neither a saint nor a martyr. Her Sonnets to the Portuguese made me break
out in goosebumps. Her
profession of love to Robert Browning made me wonder if something so bold did
not break a Commandment or two.
In high school I
discovered e. e. cummings. Poems did not
have to rhyme. They could take liberties
with convention. I ate up every poem of
his, delighting in his puzzling lyricism.
For years I taught Frost
and Dickens and Eliot to reluctant readers. I tried to infuse them with the
thrill those great, famous poets gave me.
I may have failed but I had fun trying.
For my own pleasure, I
read Billy Collins and Nikki Giovanni and Naomi Shihab Nye, and I pretended to
like Silverstein and Prelutsky only for my children and students’ sake, but I
still have their books of hilarious poetry on my shelves.
As a novelist, reading
poetry is a daily brain exercise, a study of ideas and images, an interesting
formation of sentences and lines, all using an economy of words.
All of this may be why my
father was fascinated with poetry. There is a common base to mathematics, music,
and verse. They all have an internal beat,
a systematic form, a message to be portrayed.
Comments
Post a Comment